Today a child rearing centered focus
contained in the overall formula “For “ reconciliation, in part,
is influenced from the pages of Emile written by Jean-Jacques
Rousseau [ See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Jacques_Rousseau
], and the Arab and Israeli emerging traditions against a backdrop of
conflicts. None the less, it is the real emotions which are
expressed when each nation talks and then reflects on the future of
ones children.
Unanswered though, in the meantime, in
our times and era of today are, for example:
What are the real expectations and then
national aspirations of the children right now, and especially of
those who are the critical stages in their respected human [ Piaget
] development. Will there be consequences which could trigger
internal future conflicts within ones own society; the key factor in
present day internal crisis causing de-stablization; both political
and reflecting at the same time growing militant religious conflict
centered schism – i.e. cause by the emotional imprint of the Iraqi
regime of Sadam Husine’s tyrant centered violence to enforce
internal political controls.
What are the social, cultural, and
career expectations of the children of Israel when compared with Arab
children. Are the emotional mine sets of each is on the positive
aspirations results of their conscious awareness of the events of
today, or are there traces of emotional anxieties which later could
trigger personal unrests to the extent of later creating the
dependence on violent action to solve emotional crises.
Thus: Why a the inclusion of a child
rearing comparison for commonalities as per:
It is the regional focus on such
comparisons which forces the bests in ones own social and cultural
customs to set the lead which will be found most dramatically in
their out look of real commonalities; their intercultural
communications significance to establish national goals of child
rearing.
No comments:
Post a Comment